North Rhine Westphalia

The party was attended by 800 people, and it had to be dissolved when they started flying bottles and flares. The riots would have been initiated by a group of hooligans, mixed among the attendees. It is not the first time that a party convened through the social network ends with altercations. A party convened anonymously through the social network Facebook, which ultimately had to be disbanded by the police, leaving a balance of 41 detainees and 16 wounded in Wuppertal (West Germany). Local police reported that about 800 people participated in the feast, and that agents had to intervene when they started flying bottles and flares. The Ministry of Interior of the Federal State of North Rhine Westphalia explained that the riots had been initiated by a group of hooligans, followers of the local football team who had mixed with the attendees of the Festival. The danger of parties through Facebook not is the first time that a party convened through Facebook ends with altercations.

The clearest example was the Congregation 1,600 strangers who came the first weekend of June in Hamburg, opposite the House of a young woman who had invited his friends to his birthday through the social network without having marked the event as private. While the girl ended the feast, young people attended the address. This sparked a great lack of control, and the night ended with 6 detainees. Source of the news: 41 detainees and 16 wounded at a party in Germany convened by Facebook dissolved by police

Americans

It is good for knowing that 8% of the total of emissions of carbon dioxide are attributed to the houses. According to ceroCO2.org each house produces 1.300 kg of CO2 to the year. The transport is responsible for 40%. In a house that is applied the sustainability criteria could diminish the emissions until a 50% without having to make special investments, sufficient with assuming our greater degree of responsibility and personal change of habits. In summary, if from our homes we realised a small sacrifice and we assumed totally our responsibility as it suggests the treaty of Kyoto, the gain would be greatly considerable. We are thousands of million homes. Only a change of attitude in the habits of electricity consumption, the natural catastrophes that we are living do not serian so worrisome. The coal is used to provide more than 50% of the electricity in the EE.UU, only one coal power station of 500 MW produces sufficient electricity for a city of 140.000 people.

Burns 1 430.000 of tons of coal to the year. Then if an American requests or consumes more electrical current, this asking for more coal burning fire. He is an American but thousands, million Americans, how many thousands of tons of coal and the coal throws CO2 and this one is the culprit of the greenhouse effect and thus the global heating and the phenomena that we are living. There is solution? Clear that yes. The use of the clean technology and the commitment to assume our responsibility of emissions of the carbon dioxide (CO2). It is not only one plant of being able central, but also the series of small facilities of production of energy all the tie ones to the mains. Here it is where it comes increasing the lightening from which these networks can be connected with systems of generation distributed from the solar energy or thermal or electrical.

It is here where the clean technology, that is to say the photovoltaic one enters like to save to the world (PV), the solar cells, the solar paddles, who come to the mind when the solar energy is mentioned, and to turn the solar radiation into electricity or thermal solar pick up turns the solar radiation into heat that can be used to warm up the water for the tasks of the home or the heat of a house in the form of radiant heat. Then finally, it is worth the pain to begin to make our own solar paddle, truth. Today, this is not a secret.

The Coat Of Arms, An Important Development

Flag of the middle ages. The colors and clothes. Who with whom? Who who heard was at all times been an important feature in military conflicts. Was it only the hairstyle such as when the Suebi (Suebian knot). But Caesar’s armies, which since had the armor with the red color components as a sign of recognition to one? On the other hand, the SPQR which legitimized expelled the Roman legions as by people and Senate. It is not inventive.

The coat of arms was more developed out of necessity. At the times of the Crusades, the Sun proved to be the biggest enemy of the Knight. He was cooked in its own juices. So, armor (chain mail) was heated up by the Sun that you could fry like eggs on it. As protection from the Sun, the first Crusaders copied the kaftan of her opponents. I guess knowing about whose face the sun protection function. But also the increasing use of all-round closed helmets, which no longer face Tienanmen, contributed to its spread. The meaning of the colors.

Through the practical use this Cotte of the coat of arms for some time remained solid. Only internal disputes that often resulted in conflicts with each other, the colors of the banner was fought under whose leadership was carried as a differentiator. This evolved in the varied colours of today still known coat of arms course colors of the time. Medieval Surcoat or tabard. Sign on the tunic were worn first by Crusaders that served an order. This resulted in the so-called Crusaders frocks. These tunics are known as tabard. The most famous are the Crusaders with the Red Cross on a white background and the German knights with the black cross on a white background. But also the Knights Templar had a different color, the Red Cross on a black background. From the late Middle Ages, the color was always complicated. So there was the palewise frocks or but there were held the coat of arms of character of the coat of arms. What was available. The materials from which passed the frocks, were so diverse, how the materials themselves that were in the period available. Wool was the most easily accessible. Thus, the tunic of wool was also very common. Also the wool next to the property to warm and hold water, also a cooling effect in the summer heat. Combined with a linen lining, this effect was further reinforced. There was also still the pleasant smooth effect of a cloth, on the skin, to wear. But also frocks of linen and hemp were worn very much. Were made out of materials, which were easy to get. But also the more exotic materials such as silk or cotton found their way to the processing as a coat of arms. At the beginning and end. The coat of arms as a sign of dignity was worn to the outgoing middle ages. From the initial application only for the Knight, a commonly used facilities of the army was the later. Thus, also the city guard wore a coat of arms in the colors of the city in which they served. In the 17 century, the coat of arms was getting shorter and combined with the Jerkin. Importance as a distinctive mark lost the importance more and more. And uniformed aspect of the military upper hand won. At the present time, the coat of arms as a sign of recognition in the military has completely declined in importance.